Products on the market always have a variety of designs, prices, and qualities. However, for many people, especially with certain unique items like condoms, there seems to be a lot of uncertainty about whether there is a clear difference between products based on price differences. The answer will be revealed below, as the online community was recently stirred by an enthusiastic condom review from a YouTuber.
The main character in this story is Ripple_S, a YouTuber renowned for his innovative review tactics. In his latest clip, Ripple_S surprised many fans by choosing to analyze the differences between two types of condoms to see if the price difference impacts their quality. The two types of condoms he selected are Uni’s Tiger, priced at 2,100 won (approximately 42,000 VND) for a box of 10, and Sagami Original, priced at 58,400 won (nearly 120,000 VND) for a box of 10.
Initially, according to basic physical evaluations, there were differences in length and width. Specifically, Unidus Tiger measures 180mm in length and 52mm in width, while Sagami’s measurements are 170mm and 36mm, respectively. The YouTuber began by unboxing the cheaper option, Unidus, and noted a smell reminiscent of peach. He then tested the elasticity of this product. Next, the more expensive Sagami box was opened, and everyone acknowledged its remarkable thinness. Furthermore, being made from polyurethane, the likelihood of allergic reactions is relatively low for users.
Of course, after the review, it was time for selection. According to the YouTuber, it is best to categorize the target audience. For those under 20 who may not have the financial means, the cheaper option is acceptable; however, for those who can afford it, they should opt for the more expensive condoms. Ripple_S concluded that Sagami remains the best in terms of material, size, and elasticity.
However, it is quite surprising that Ripple_S’s review received mixed reactions. One of the most liked comments criticized him for not conducting a thorough experience before reviewing. With any product, only after experiencing it can one provide the most authentic evaluation.