People often say that being a streamer is one of those jobs where you “sit comfortably and eat from a golden bowl.” This is certainly not without reason, as along with fame, popularity, and stable income come many sacrifices such as health, creativity, or simply having to work during times when regular people are resting and relaxing. However, it also depends on the case; for Sally – the beautiful streamer below, many may only be able to use one word “lucky” to describe her advantageous path to success.
The reason for this is that although she is not highly rated in terms of content, nor is she very active in her streaming career, Sally has achieved countless successes in her career path. And let’s take the simplest benchmark for comparison, which is the amount of money she earns from viewer donations.
Specifically, this February, Sally was the female streamer who received the most donations on the Afreeca TV platform, with an amount converted to about 163 million won, equivalent to over 3.2 billion VND. And if we divide this by the number of hours streamed, we can see that each hour, Sally pockets about 36 million VND – a considerable amount, even equal to the monthly salary of an average person. But remember, this is the amount Sally earns in just one hour.
Notably, the gap that Sally maintains with the second place is also quite high, one and a half times that of the nearest name chasing her. However, this has also sparked quite a bit of controversy, as many neutral viewers even claim that this is somewhat undeserved, as what Sally primarily does is stream in revealing outfits, flaunting her deep cleavage, yet that is still enough to attract fans. In reality, no matter how uncomfortable it may be, the result is likely to remain the same, as it must be admitted that Sally’s appearance is a significant advantage compared to many of her colleagues.
In reality, alongside content, the factor of “looks” still plays a quite important role in the success of any streamer. And as for Sally, it seems that just meeting the “audio-visual” needs of viewers is enough.
